why job evaluation or job grading?

How do you determine whether two roles are 'equivalent' or not? And how do you ensure that salary differences remain objective and defensible as roles constantly change?

Job evaluation provides a clear answer. By consistently valuing roles based on responsibility, expertise, complexity, and impact, an objective framework for job description and remuneration is created.

our 5+1 Compas® evaluation methodology.

Objective job evaluation requires a reliable and proven evaluation methodology. That is why Randstad relies on the 5+1 Compas® methodology for job grading, developed by the former Hudson (now part of Randstad).

This analytical evaluation methodology is based on our 5+1 competency model and assesses roles based on five core criteria plus one additional dimension, ensuring a complete and balanced evaluation. By using a uniform set of objective criteria – a shared scale for all roles – evaluation can be performed objectively. 

Each criterion generates a score, after which these scores are aggregated into a total score. Thus, every role receives a 'weight', allowing different roles to be objectively compared with one another. In this way, roles can be ranked from low to high and equivalent roles can be clustered into the same grade.

are you struggling with a consistent approach

to job evaluation?

contact us

frequently asked questions about job grading.

contact us

together, we’ll find the optimal solution for your business.

General